- Male
- 26 Years
- 20/02/2025
Hey, I'm a bit worried and need some advice. I took an HIV 1 and 2 ECLIA antibody test on the 63rd day after potential exposure, and it was done using the Roche e411 analyzer. I'm curious about how accurate the results might be at this stage. Should I trust the results, or do I need to retest later?
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
kk take
Dr. Mubarak Suggests...
Consult a Infectious Disease specialist
Answered 04/07/2025
0
0
Ask Apollo
AI powered Health Chatbot
At 63 days post-exposure, an HIV 1 and 2 ECLIA antibody test using the Roche e411 analyzer is highly reliable. This test detects antibodies and possibly antigens related to HIV, and by this time frame, most individuals who have contracted HIV will test positive. However, no test is 100% definitive immediately after exposure.
-
Accuracy at 63 days: The test is considered very accurate, with a high sensitivity and specificity, meaning false negatives are rare at this stage.
-
Trusting the results: If your test is negative, it is very reassuring, but some guidelines recommend a follow-up test at 3 months (90 days) post-exposure for complete confirmation.
-
Retesting: If your initial test is negative and you have no ongoing risk, a retest at 90 days can provide additional reassurance. If positive, confirmatory testing will be done by your healthcare provider.
-
Next steps: Discuss your results with a healthcare professional who can guide you on any further testing or preventive measures.
Overall, your test at 63 days is a strong indicator of your HIV status, but a follow-up test at 90 days is often advised for absolute certainty.
Other Related topics like...
Is a follow-up HIV test needed at 90 days? Answered 20/08/2025
0
0
More Infectious Disease Health Queries
View allSo, I'm a 23-year-old guy, and earlier today, a bat flew into my room and landed on my bed. It was pretty small, and I figured I could just pick it up to let it out, right? But when I tried doing that with my left hand, it turned its head and bit my thumb. There arent any visible marks, not even a scratch, and the skin didnt get pierced, but Ive heard bats can transmit rabies. I immediately washed my hand with a lot of soap and antiseptic. Should I be worried even though theres no visible bite mark?
Although there's no visible bite mark, it's still essential to consult a doctor immediately, as bat bites can transmit rabies even without visible wounds; your doctor may recommend post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) as a precautionary measure to prevent rabies infectio
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
I'm just a bit worried and curious about something. If a prostitute tests negative for HIV, what are the chances of someone else getting infected? Also, after the window period, what kind of HIV test would be good enough to rely on?
If a prostitute tests negative for HIV, the chances of others getting infected are low but not zero. It is still possible for HIV to be transmitted through unprotected sexual contact or sharing needles with someone who is HIV positive. After the window period, the most common and reliable HIV test is the HIV antibody test. This test looks for antibodies that your body makes in response to the HIV infection. It is important to follow up with healthcare provider for proper testing and guidance.
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
I'm a bit worried because I had an encounter with a monkey today, and it chased after me. When I got home, I noticed a small cut, but I'm not sure if the monkey actually touched or scratched me. Should I be concerned about any potential health risks from this?
I f had bleeding then you had risky eposure better to get complete course of ARV,visit physician for the same
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
Health Articles for you
View all
Disclaimer: Answers on Apollo 247 are not intended to replace your doctor advice. Always seek help of a professional doctor in case of an medical emergency or ailment.