- Male
- 26 Years
- 20/02/2025
Hey, I'm a bit worried and need some advice. I took an HIV 1 and 2 ECLIA antibody test on the 63rd day after potential exposure, and it was done using the Roche e411 analyzer. I'm curious about how accurate the results might be at this stage. Should I trust the results, or do I need to retest later?
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
kk take
Dr. Mubarak Suggests...
Consult a Infectious Disease specialist
Answered 04/07/2025
0
0
Ask Apollo
AI powered Health Chatbot
At 63 days post-exposure, an HIV 1 and 2 ECLIA antibody test using the Roche e411 analyzer is highly reliable. This test detects antibodies and possibly antigens related to HIV, and by this time frame, most individuals who have contracted HIV will test positive. However, no test is 100% definitive immediately after exposure.
-
Accuracy at 63 days: The test is considered very accurate, with a high sensitivity and specificity, meaning false negatives are rare at this stage.
-
Trusting the results: If your test is negative, it is very reassuring, but some guidelines recommend a follow-up test at 3 months (90 days) post-exposure for complete confirmation.
-
Retesting: If your initial test is negative and you have no ongoing risk, a retest at 90 days can provide additional reassurance. If positive, confirmatory testing will be done by your healthcare provider.
-
Next steps: Discuss your results with a healthcare professional who can guide you on any further testing or preventive measures.
Overall, your test at 63 days is a strong indicator of your HIV status, but a follow-up test at 90 days is often advised for absolute certainty.
Other Related topics like...
Is a follow-up HIV test needed at 90 days? Answered 20/08/2025
0
0
More Infectious Disease Health Queries
View allI'm feeling a bit worried about my recent blood test results. I had a torch panel test done using EIA, and the results showed that my HSV 12 IgG level is at 1.6 and the IgM is at 0.2. What does this mean? Does it indicate that I have a herpes infection? Can you help me understand this better?
An IgG level of 1.6 indicates a past infection with herpes simplex virus, while an IgM level of 0.2 suggests a low likelihood of a recent infection. This means that you have been exposed to the herpes virus in the past, but it does not necessarily indicate a current or active infection. It is important to consult with your healthcare provider for further evaluation and interpretation of these results.
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
I've been dealing with minor fevers recently, especially in the evenings, and I'm worried because I had typhoid almost two years ago. I decided to get some tests done, and the results showed my Typhi IgM is weak positive and typhi H is reactive up to a titre of 140. I'm not sure what this means. Does this indicate I still have typhoid, or is this a normal finding after having had it before?
no it is a minor infection
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
I'm on Rifampin, Ethambutol, and Pyrazinamide for TB in my lymph nodes and have been taking them for the last 8 months. The swelling in my neck has disappeared, but my ESR is still at 35. Should I keep taking the meds or stop them now?
Tab augmentin duo 625mg ,orally ,thrice daily for 5 days advised to the patient.Also syrup salbutamol 10ml thrice daily for 7 days is advised to the patient.Steam inhalation is also advised twice Daily to the patient. Also continue ATT as advised to the patient.
Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors
Health Articles for you
View all
Disclaimer: Answers on Apollo 247 are not intended to replace your doctor advice. Always seek help of a professional doctor in case of an medical emergency or ailment.