apollo
  • Female
  • 45 Years
  • 22/01/2025

I'm really worried about some recent health reports I've got. My TSH levels were high at 10.3, so my doctor increased my thyroid medication from 100mg to 125mg. Then after about 25 days, my TSH dropped to 0.70, and I was advised to cut down the medication to 75mg. I'm also confused because my TMT test came back positive for inducible myocardial ischemia, but my ECG and echocardiography were normal. The doctor is now suggesting I go for an angiogram. I'm really anxious about whether these thyroid level changes could be affecting my TMT results. Should I be rushing into getting the angiogram, and is there a real chance of having heart issues even though the ECG and echo were normal? Any advice would be really appreciated.

Doctor 1

Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors

Yes its is due to fluctating tsh levels. U may repeat angio after 6 months.

Dr. Ranjith Suggests...

Consult a Cardiologist

Answered 04/07/2025

0

0

Sick? Talk to a doctor now

More Cardiology Health Queries

View all

I'm looking at my angiography report, and it states something like a 10060 17 blockage in the veins. I'm really unsure about what this means for my treatment options. Should I be considering surgery, or could something like using rings be effective without having to go through an operation? Also, I don't have diabetes, and there's no family history of heart issues. Would love to hear your thoughts on what might be the best route for me.

take treatment

read more
Doctor 1Doctor 2

Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors

I'm trying to understand the difference between the results of my echo and my CT scan regarding my heart condition. My echo shows mild concentric LVH with lvpwdd 12.2 and ivs d 12, and my LVEF is at 73. But my CT scan, which was a 128-slice MDCT of the heart, suggests normal LVH and a normal LV cavity with normal thickness, having a zero calcium score. Also, my TMT came out negative for any chest pain-related issues. I'm kind of confused here. Which result should I rely on when it comes to the left ventricular hypertrophy? Which is considered more accurate or should I be concerned about something else here?

Both CT angiography and echocardiogram are valuable tools for assessing left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), but they provide different types of information. In your case, since the CT angiography showed normal left ventricular cavity with normal thickness and normal coronary arteries, and zero calcium score, it indicates a healthy heart without any structural abnormalities or blockages. On the other hand, the echocardiogram reported mild concentric LVH with specific measurements of left ventricular posterior wall thickness (LVPWd) and interventricular septum thickness (IVSd). Given the discrepancy between the two imaging modalities, it is important to consider the clinical context and overall picture. In this scenario, the findings from the CT angiography showing a normal heart structure and function, along with a negative TMT (treadmill test), are more indicative of a healthy heart. Therefore, the CT angiography results are more reliable in this case. To address the chest pain related problem, you can consider taking medications like Amlodipine (5mg) for blood pressure control and Metoprolol (25mg) for heart rate control. Additionally, Nitroglycerin sublingual tablets can be used for chest pain relief as needed. It is also important to follow up with your healthcare provider for further evaluation and management.

read more
Doctor 1Doctor 2

Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors

I've been feeling a pressure on my chest for the past 56 days. I don't have a fever or a cough, but my mouth gets really dry and my saliva seems thicker than usual. What could be causing this? Should I be worried?

do chest xray

read more
Doctor 1Doctor 2

Answered by 1 Apollo Doctors

Disclaimer: Answers on Apollo 247 are not intended to replace your doctor advice. Always seek help of a professional doctor in case of an medical emergency or ailment.